One of the hardest things about blogging solo is that there's nobody else to fill in when you're busy! I'm currently working on an article, among other things, but I'll have more posts and photos up within the next couple of days. Promise.
articles and blog posts
Friday, November 21, 2008
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
QOTD: Cooking Classes
I know when I went off to college I barely knew how to cook, and even now I would not call myself a pro. Apparently I'm not alone; celebrity chef Jamie Oliver has approached the British government to ask them to offer cooking classes to low-income people because he believes many U.K. citizens' inability to cook will cause them to eat less healthy meals during the economic downturn.
According to the Washington Post, Oliver argued that, for the first time, many families in the U.K. cannot cook well and are likely to rely on take-out for their daily meals. He also suggested that people with less money to spare are not likely to try new recipes that might be more nutritious.
While the chef was worried about the nutritional quality of the food people were eating, if he's right this inability to cook may also contribute to an individual’s or families’ financial difficulties.
After the Congressional Food Stamp Challenge last year, Washington Post Lean Plate Columnist Sally Squires wrote about how to shop in order to stretch food money. She also mentioned how a local executive chef, Rick Hindle, had created several tasty, healthy meals for a dollar or less each by cooking from scratch. Not even McDonalds offers meals cheaper than his “colorful quesadillas” (60 cents per serving), but both Squire's suggestions and Hindle's recipes required cooking.
Recipes abound online, as do video clips of cooking demonstrations. Assuming younger people are the ones least likely to know how to cook and that most younger people in the U.K. and the U.S. have access to these online resources, would the addition of free cooking classes help? Or are the real issues convenience, time, and lack of interest in cooking?
If a free class on cooking inexpensive, nutritious food were available in your area, would you take one?
Bonus find: If you're looking to pinch dollars, the USDA database of recipes is searchable by the estimated price of the finished meal.
According to the Washington Post, Oliver argued that, for the first time, many families in the U.K. cannot cook well and are likely to rely on take-out for their daily meals. He also suggested that people with less money to spare are not likely to try new recipes that might be more nutritious.
While the chef was worried about the nutritional quality of the food people were eating, if he's right this inability to cook may also contribute to an individual’s or families’ financial difficulties.
After the Congressional Food Stamp Challenge last year, Washington Post Lean Plate Columnist Sally Squires wrote about how to shop in order to stretch food money. She also mentioned how a local executive chef, Rick Hindle, had created several tasty, healthy meals for a dollar or less each by cooking from scratch. Not even McDonalds offers meals cheaper than his “colorful quesadillas” (60 cents per serving), but both Squire's suggestions and Hindle's recipes required cooking.
Recipes abound online, as do video clips of cooking demonstrations. Assuming younger people are the ones least likely to know how to cook and that most younger people in the U.K. and the U.S. have access to these online resources, would the addition of free cooking classes help? Or are the real issues convenience, time, and lack of interest in cooking?
If a free class on cooking inexpensive, nutritious food were available in your area, would you take one?
Bonus find: If you're looking to pinch dollars, the USDA database of recipes is searchable by the estimated price of the finished meal.
Labels:
cooking,
cooking classes,
economy,
Jamie Oliver,
QOTD,
recipes,
Rick Hindle,
Sally Squires,
U.K.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Women's Titanic Memorial in Southwest DC
This post is a response to Melissa’s question about the Titanic Memorial from the comments on QOTD: How to Respond to Teens Attacking Adults in SW DC. Picture by Flickr user NCinDC.
If you follow the sidewalk southeast past the last club on Water Street, SW, you will find yourself leaving the road to walk on a wide promenade between the glimmering surface of the Washington Channel and the high, curving boughs of old trees in Washington Channel Park.
Follow the quaint globe lights to the very end of the park and you will see a tall statue of a man with his arms flung wide to form a cross, a flowing stone cloth partly draped around his body. Behind his left hand the water stretches out past Hains Point to join the Anacostia and Potomac rivers as they flow together toward the ocean.
It's a quiet spot, a fitting place for a silent tribute, even though it's not the location the monument's designers had in mind.
According to the Great Lakes Titanic Society and the National Park Service, the Women's Titanic Memorial was initially erected by the Women's Titanic Memorial Association in Rock Creek Park at the end of New Hampshire Avenue on May 26, 1931 to honor the men who gave their lives on the Titanic so that women and children could escape on life boats.
Just over thirty years later, in 1966, the planners for the Kennedy Center decided on the same spot, so the Women's Titanic Monument was slipped into storage to make room. In 1968 the monument was quietly planted in its current home in Washington Channel Park, and soon few besides the locals seemed to remember it existed.
According to an old fragment of a Washington Post article, twelve years later a small group of men decided to change that. In 1978 they began an annual tradition of toasting the men who gave their lives on the Titanic every April 15th. This tradition has expanded into a full evening of events: a men-only black tie dinner by the Kennedy Center on the 14th, followed by a ceremonial walk to the memorial in full tuxedos, and culminating in a round of champagne toasts in front of the memorial at 1:30 a.m. on the 15th.
The Men's Titanic Society coordinates this quirky annual event. It has become such an ingrained tradition that the society's founder and president, Jim Silman, poo-poohed a suggestion this year to move the memorial to a more prominent position at the tip of Hains Point where J. Seward Johnson's sculpture "The Awakening" once stood.
To reach Washington Channel Park and the Women's Titanic Memorial by Metro, you can walk straight south from the Waterfront Metro on 4th Street and hang a left on P Street. However, it's a prettier walk if you take M Street to 6th Street SW and walk through Washington Channel Park, especially if you manage to come in time to watch the sunset play on the water of the Channel.
Google Map:
View Larger Map
If you follow the sidewalk southeast past the last club on Water Street, SW, you will find yourself leaving the road to walk on a wide promenade between the glimmering surface of the Washington Channel and the high, curving boughs of old trees in Washington Channel Park.
Follow the quaint globe lights to the very end of the park and you will see a tall statue of a man with his arms flung wide to form a cross, a flowing stone cloth partly draped around his body. Behind his left hand the water stretches out past Hains Point to join the Anacostia and Potomac rivers as they flow together toward the ocean.
It's a quiet spot, a fitting place for a silent tribute, even though it's not the location the monument's designers had in mind.
According to the Great Lakes Titanic Society and the National Park Service, the Women's Titanic Memorial was initially erected by the Women's Titanic Memorial Association in Rock Creek Park at the end of New Hampshire Avenue on May 26, 1931 to honor the men who gave their lives on the Titanic so that women and children could escape on life boats.
Just over thirty years later, in 1966, the planners for the Kennedy Center decided on the same spot, so the Women's Titanic Monument was slipped into storage to make room. In 1968 the monument was quietly planted in its current home in Washington Channel Park, and soon few besides the locals seemed to remember it existed.
According to an old fragment of a Washington Post article, twelve years later a small group of men decided to change that. In 1978 they began an annual tradition of toasting the men who gave their lives on the Titanic every April 15th. This tradition has expanded into a full evening of events: a men-only black tie dinner by the Kennedy Center on the 14th, followed by a ceremonial walk to the memorial in full tuxedos, and culminating in a round of champagne toasts in front of the memorial at 1:30 a.m. on the 15th.
The Men's Titanic Society coordinates this quirky annual event. It has become such an ingrained tradition that the society's founder and president, Jim Silman, poo-poohed a suggestion this year to move the memorial to a more prominent position at the tip of Hains Point where J. Seward Johnson's sculpture "The Awakening" once stood.
To reach Washington Channel Park and the Women's Titanic Memorial by Metro, you can walk straight south from the Waterfront Metro on 4th Street and hang a left on P Street. However, it's a prettier walk if you take M Street to 6th Street SW and walk through Washington Channel Park, especially if you manage to come in time to watch the sunset play on the water of the Channel.
Google Map:
View Larger Map
Friday, November 14, 2008
Posting Delay - Titanic Memorial
UPDATE 11/15/08 10:34 p.m.: The post is now up here.
The Titanic Memorial post I promised to put up today will go uptonight tomorrow. Sorry for the delay!
The Titanic Memorial post I promised to put up today will go up
Thursday, November 13, 2008
QOTD: Walking Lessons and Shoes
Today’s article brought up two questions. A link on the Around Town section of NBC’s local Washington, DC news site about walking lessons led to an article in the New York Times about walking lessons... in New York City. While some local residents may be interested in taking or offering walking lessons after reading the article, it seemed a little odd to include an article about a class in New York City in a section about the DC area.
The linked article explored walking lessonsin yoga classes offered by Jonathan FitzGordon at Yoga Center of Brooklyn. They sound similar to the classes by Amy Matthews at the Breathing Project referenced in an article seven months ago in New York Magazine about walking barefoot. Unlike this earlier article, the New York Times article does not mention one of the most obvious culprits for bad posture and walking-related health problems: shoes. More specifically, shoes that are known to destroy people’s bodies, such as high-heeled pumps.
I thought this was particularly interesting since the picture on NBC’s site for the article includes four women in what could be a dance studio, three of whom appear to be wearing three to four inch heels.
Would you take walking lessons to allow you to continue to wear uncomfortable shoes, or would you switch shoes first? Do you think FitzGordon didn’t mention shoes because he figured it would be easier to get New Yorkers to take lessons without having to convince them to give up their heels?
And, do you think “local” articles should always refer to things happening in and around DC, or is it okay to have one that’s actually for New York City?
The linked article explored walking lessons
I thought this was particularly interesting since the picture on NBC’s site for the article includes four women in what could be a dance studio, three of whom appear to be wearing three to four inch heels.
Would you take walking lessons to allow you to continue to wear uncomfortable shoes, or would you switch shoes first? Do you think FitzGordon didn’t mention shoes because he figured it would be easier to get New Yorkers to take lessons without having to convince them to give up their heels?
And, do you think “local” articles should always refer to things happening in and around DC, or is it okay to have one that’s actually for New York City?
Labels:
DC,
NBC,
New York Magazine,
New York Times,
NYC,
QOTD,
shoes,
walking
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
QOTD: How to Respond to Teens Attacking Adults in SW DC
According to NBC (thanks DCist for the link), last week a woman was assaulted "for fun" a couple of blocks from what will be my new home. The article also mentions that teenagers jumped a police officer in front of the nearby CVS after he asked them why they were not in school. The teens stole his radio and tried to take his gun. A month ago an elderly man died after being beat up by teenagers in the same area.
While I know my current neighborhood is hardly the safest place in the world, the majority of the violence I have witnessed here involved black teenagers and young adults fighting with each other. As a white woman who is friendly but largely uninvolved in my neighbors' worlds, the worst I ever received was some benign drunken harrassment and a few young boys hitting on me. Almost all of my interactions with my neighbors here have been positive, even when I was digging into things some people would rather not talk about.
Seeing articles like this makes me wonder if the same thing will work in my new neighborhood.
I've already spent some time in Southwest. While the street I'm going to live on seems sleepy and quiet, plenty of people (including teenagers) hang out on the stoops just a few blocks over. There is also a very obvious income gap between my section of the neighborhood and theirs. On the one side, multi-story, expensive-looking rowhouses sheltered by tall, old trees and fronted by carefully maintained gardens line the streets. On the other, short, small, identical homes squat along treeless streets with waist-height chain-link fences and clothes lines in the back. My section of the neighborhood is mixed race; the other section seems to be almost all black.
The split in the neighborhood lies along 3rd Street SW, next to the commercial area that includes Safeway, the Metro, the CVS and Bank of America trailers, and the dirt pit that will become the new Waterside Mall. As the NBC article mentions, plenty of teenagers hang out in front of the stores there. I've said hello to them and laughed at their jokes, but I've never questioned them or challenged their right to be there as the police officer did.
When I move to Southwest I plan to start reporting on the area. This means, at a minimum, I will be walking around and talking to everyone I meet, getting to know who lives there, who works there, who hangs out, and what their stories are. Including the teenagers. Inevitably some people will disagree with the articles that come out of these conversations.
Years ago in Texas several of my guy friends realized that they could not stop me from going into places they saw as dangerous. Long before I took a Sociology class or wrote an article, I walked into places others labeled "The Barrio" or "that crack house" just to talk to the people who lived there. My friends' reaction, in typical Texas fashion, was to give me easily concealed weapons and teach me how to seriously injure or kill someone.
Inscription: "(Heart) for Chris with love"
I never had to use these weapons, and I stopped carrying them when I started needing to pass metal detectors to get into the libraries in DC. I also stopped carrying them because I don't want to wind up accidentally killing or crippling someone over a misunderstanding or pretty theft. To me, losing my wallet is not worth someone else's life.
On the other hand, I don't want to end up with my hands held behind my back by one teenager as another one beats me up just for walking down the street. Being able to throw the person holding me would be great in this instance, but would having a weapon like a knife, a night stick, pepper spray, or even a gun help? I don't know.
What do you think? Should I start bearing arms and really practicing martial arts again, or are my best defenses being aware, making friends, and talking my way through the situations I find myself in? Do I realistically need to worry about this more in Southwest than in Columbia Heights?
While I know my current neighborhood is hardly the safest place in the world, the majority of the violence I have witnessed here involved black teenagers and young adults fighting with each other. As a white woman who is friendly but largely uninvolved in my neighbors' worlds, the worst I ever received was some benign drunken harrassment and a few young boys hitting on me. Almost all of my interactions with my neighbors here have been positive, even when I was digging into things some people would rather not talk about.
Seeing articles like this makes me wonder if the same thing will work in my new neighborhood.
I've already spent some time in Southwest. While the street I'm going to live on seems sleepy and quiet, plenty of people (including teenagers) hang out on the stoops just a few blocks over. There is also a very obvious income gap between my section of the neighborhood and theirs. On the one side, multi-story, expensive-looking rowhouses sheltered by tall, old trees and fronted by carefully maintained gardens line the streets. On the other, short, small, identical homes squat along treeless streets with waist-height chain-link fences and clothes lines in the back. My section of the neighborhood is mixed race; the other section seems to be almost all black.
The split in the neighborhood lies along 3rd Street SW, next to the commercial area that includes Safeway, the Metro, the CVS and Bank of America trailers, and the dirt pit that will become the new Waterside Mall. As the NBC article mentions, plenty of teenagers hang out in front of the stores there. I've said hello to them and laughed at their jokes, but I've never questioned them or challenged their right to be there as the police officer did.
When I move to Southwest I plan to start reporting on the area. This means, at a minimum, I will be walking around and talking to everyone I meet, getting to know who lives there, who works there, who hangs out, and what their stories are. Including the teenagers. Inevitably some people will disagree with the articles that come out of these conversations.
Years ago in Texas several of my guy friends realized that they could not stop me from going into places they saw as dangerous. Long before I took a Sociology class or wrote an article, I walked into places others labeled "The Barrio" or "that crack house" just to talk to the people who lived there. My friends' reaction, in typical Texas fashion, was to give me easily concealed weapons and teach me how to seriously injure or kill someone.
Inscription: "(Heart) for Chris with love"
I never had to use these weapons, and I stopped carrying them when I started needing to pass metal detectors to get into the libraries in DC. I also stopped carrying them because I don't want to wind up accidentally killing or crippling someone over a misunderstanding or pretty theft. To me, losing my wallet is not worth someone else's life.
On the other hand, I don't want to end up with my hands held behind my back by one teenager as another one beats me up just for walking down the street. Being able to throw the person holding me would be great in this instance, but would having a weapon like a knife, a night stick, pepper spray, or even a gun help? I don't know.
What do you think? Should I start bearing arms and really practicing martial arts again, or are my best defenses being aware, making friends, and talking my way through the situations I find myself in? Do I realistically need to worry about this more in Southwest than in Columbia Heights?
Labels:
Columbia Heights,
concealed weapons,
crime,
DC,
journalism,
NBC,
QOTD,
SW
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)